Okay, maybe my previous post was a tad melodramatic. What can I say? I had too little sleep, a pounding on-off headache and too much McDonalds. Upsetting news like the character assasination of one of my favourite TV characters pushed me over the edge. ;)
Still downloading the episode (Wooo! 50%!) but I’ve been ruminating on what I’ve heard went on (since I refuse to be completely spoiled)… even though I should be (a) catching up on sleep or (b) doing school work.
I think Sark has an endgame, that is still unknown to everyone. That much is clear, and I’ve always believed that there’s something driving him to do the things he does. JJ may have fallen down my list of esteemed people, but he’s said that Sark’s his favourite character, and I like to think that JJ wouldn’t just fuckin’ kill Sark’s character without some kind of reason in mind. Plus, given what we’ve seen in S3 so far, and what we know of him, I doubt that Sark’s just falling apart. Nuh uh. He has a reason, damnit.
He didn’t seem particularly impressed with Lauren during that carpark scene (their first and only encounter before this episode). Lauren hasn’t done anything particularly impressive since she went baddie; it’s not like she’s this spy extraordinare. In “Crossings”, one episode ago, Sark voiced his dissatisfaction with the Covenant. He didn’t seem particularly attached to Allison when she reappeared, and I presume they’ve had a close relationship in the past.
Yet, we’re supposed to buy that he’s suddenly ga-ga over Lauren? That he suddenly thinks she’s the Best. Spy. Ever? Fuckit. Lauren does NOT deserve “You are so good, do you know that?”. That sentiment belongs to Sydney, damnit! Are they trying to erase Sarkney history? (Grrrrr. Don’t take away all the tiny morsels of shippyness we get, damnit!) And Sark looking scared? He has too much control over his emotions and what he wants people to see, to let himself go like that. There’s also the fact that Lauren murdered his father (although he doesn’t seem to have the fondest feelings for Lazarey); Sark (presumably) wanted revenge on Sydney (Julia) for the pseudo-murder early in the season yet he has a thing for Lauren, the woman who really did murder his father? Pffft.
No way. That is NOT Sark. Not as we’ve seen him. This is more like Pod!Sark. So, I think there’s a reason for all the screwed-up-ness of this episode. Boyfriend is playing everyone. I think taking down the Covenant is part of his current plan, and somehow Lauren plays into that plan. Hell, maybe there’s a bigger plan, and Lauren’s a fucking pawn that will be killed off.
I refuse to believe that he has genuine ‘feelings’ for Lauren, ‘cos it’s preposterous for such feelings to develop (and manifest themselves, no less) in Sark in one effing episode. If this was One Tree Hill, I might buy it… but Alias is, for the most part, an intelligent show. I refuse to believe that Sark, the spymaster that he is, is letting things overwhelm him. He has always, always been in control… of his emotions, at the very least, even when he wasn’t in control of situations. I think he’s been such a brilliant, subtle character so far… and I like to think that JJ cultivated all that for a reason.
Also, “You’re so good, do you know that?” came in an episode (one of my favourites, actually!) when there was deception (Sark not killing Sloane in actuality, though he told Syd he intended to), a new partnership (Irina/Sark/Sloane), and the start of the chain of events that lead to Phase One and so on. So, maybe the re-using of that line may signal similar elements: deception (Sark deceiving Lauren), a new partnership (Sark/Lauren, to bring down the Covenant maybe? Or possibly, lying the foundation for some other alliance), and the start of a chain of events that will lead up to the season finale, where we’ll get a big Sark payoff.
Who knows? Things might turn all right in the end.
[/Sark apologist]